Melissa Harris-Perry, a Borg drone from the cube ship “Zero of Nothing,” speaks about collectivism, nothingness, and nonsense. She actually appeared sincere during her whole empty monologue.
Former Weather Underground radical Kathy Boudin, who served 22 years in prison for her role in an armored-car robbery that left three dead in 1981, now has an adjunct professorship at Columbia University’s School of Social Work, the New York Post reports:
Boudin’s status of perp-turned-prof outraged the widow of one of her victims, Brinks guard and dad of three Peter Paige, who was gunned down by her accomplices from the Black Liberation Army on Oct. 20, 1981, in Rockland County.
Boudin acted as a getaway driver in the heist.
“She doesn’t deserve a job at all,” said Josephine Paige, 74, when told of Boudin’s posts. “She doesn’t deserve anything, nothing at all. I think she should be back in an institution.”
Kathy Boudin had more than enough time to earn a garbage degree in social work. That’s about on par as her educator-in-crime Billy Ayers and his nonsense education degree. You have to give these universities credit for keeping these wretched souls out of trouble by granting them employment. Perhaps they can poison the minds of another generation.
Here’s one place that you can go that covers the Weather Underground. So much information about Obama’s past has been glossed over or ignored by our media. It was so difficult for me to believe that Barry won the office the first time. I thought it was all about Bush-derangement syndrome, the wars, and the housing bubble. Nevertheless, winning the high office the second time woke me up to a very ugly reality. The general population is more gullible, apathetic, stupid, and dependent than I had once believed. The zombie population, those who take, break, and procreate with impunity have overwhelmed a system that requires an educated and responsible citizenry. Kathy Boudin along with Barry are the ones who never really had any real talent and know-how, but they were given a pass. No one gives a crap about the social work department at Columbia, but the United States may never recover from the slack its media and empty-minded voters cut for Barry.
“Fiscal Cliff” put in a much better perspective.
* U.S. Tax revenue: $2,170,000,000,000
* Fed budget: $3,820,000,000,000
* New debt: $ 1,650,000,000,000
* National debt: $14,271,000,000,000
* Recent budget cuts: $ 38,500,000,000
Let’s now remove 8 zeros and pretend it’s a household budget:
* Annual family income: $21,700
* Money the family spent: $38,200
* New debt on the credit card: $16,500
* Outstanding balance on the credit card: $142,710
* Total budget cuts so far: $38.50
Got It ??…….OK now,
Lesson # 2:
Here’s another way to look at the Debt Ceiling:
Let’s say, You come home from work and find
there has been a sewer backup in your neighborhood….
and your home has sewage all the way up to your ceilings.
What do you think you should do ……
Raise the ceilings, or remove the shit
The Obama Record: Lost in all the back-and-forth over the removal of Winston Churchill’s bust from the Oval Office is why the president would snub the Brits. The answer is his father and his Kenyan roots.
The man sitting in the Oval Office views the Anglo-American alliance through the same anticolonial lens as his late father and their shared hero — Frantz Fanon — who argued that America and Britain were the great oppressors of the world.
From 1920 to 1963, Britain colonized Kenya, and according to Obama, mistreated his grandfather in the process.
He also claims his father was detained briefly during the emergency declared by the British to put down the savage Mau-Mau uprising there.
Winston Churchill, you see, was prime minister at the time, and as such became the object of their scorn.
As Britain was putting down the rebellion, its embassy in the U.S. warned that Kenyans seeking to study in the U.S. shared a dangerous antipathy toward both Britain and America. The exchange students happened to include Obama’s father, Barack Hussein Obama Sr., whom our current president worshipped.
A 1959 British cable said the group of students had radical ties and a reputation for “both anti-American and anti-white” views.
My wife saw this tax lesson in the comment section and mentioned it to me. I remember reading about the 10 men and how the rich guy was treated. Here’s the lesson for those who are willing to read and learn:
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes
If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18..
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that’s what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and
seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a
curve. ‘Since you are all such good customers,’ he said,’I’m going to reduce the
cost of your daily beer by $20. ‘Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.The group
still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men
were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six
men – the paying customers?
How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair
share?’ They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted
that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end
up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be
fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the
same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings)
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings)
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings)
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings)
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 ( 22% savings)
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings)
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to
drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their
I only got a dollar out of the $20, declared the sixth man.
He pointed to the tenth man, but he got $10!
Yeah, that’s right, exclaimed the fifth man.
I only saved a dollar, too.
It’s unfair that he got ten times more Than I
That’s true! shouted the seventh man.
Why should he get $10 back when I got only two?
The wealthy get all the breaks!
Wait a minute,’ yelled the first four men in unison.
We didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man (the richest) didn’t show up for drinks, so the
nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill,
they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all
of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax
system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a
tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just
may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the
atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.Professor of Economics
University of Georgia
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
Here’s an old post regarding government largess. It’s also worth reading.
President Obama said last month that America can educate its way to prosperity if Congress sends money to states to prevent public school layoffs and “rehire even more teachers.” Mitt Romney was having none of it, invoking “the message of Wisconsin” and arguing that the solution to our economic woes is to cut the size of government and shift resources to the private sector. Mr. Romney later stated that he wasn’t calling for a reduction in the teacher force—but perhaps there would be some wisdom in doing just that.
Cato Institute scholar Andrew Coulson on how public school employment has soared over the past 40 years even as student enrollment has flat-lined.
Since 1970, the public school workforce has roughly doubled—to 6.4 million from 3.3 million—and two-thirds of those new hires are teachers or teachers’ aides. Over the same period, enrollment rose by a tepid 8.5%. Employment has thus grown 11 times faster than enrollment. If we returned to the student-to-staff ratio of 1970, American taxpayers would save about $210 billion annually in personnel costs.
Barack Obama may have got worse high school grades than George W Bush after new evidence showed the current president was among a college class with poor average SAT scores.
Doubts about the supposedly superior intellect of Mr Obama were first raised after he refused to release his academic record.
He has also made some factual errors during his time in the job – although he is still a very long way behind his gaff-prone predecessor.
Doubts? It took the media some time before they started questioning this goof. He would have imploded under reasonable scrutiny, but white guilt, a compliant media, war exhaustion, and Bush derangement syndrome swept this guy into office. There are actually people out there who will vote for this guy again! They walk, or rather slither among us. Hey, how about those great job numbers that got posted today. Great job Barry!