All you need to know about Hillary and Barry is right there!
Police in Cologne
David French wrote a piece describing how governments and the media conspire to hide the truth regarding Muslims. It is nothing new and has been practiced both in Europe and the United States for quite some time. Pervasive black crime in large cities like New York and Chicago will often report the crime without any description of the perpetrator. More often than not, it is not for the lack of a description of the offender, but rather an agenda driven media with other ideas about truth regarding minority criminals. As Mr. French points out:
The truth disrupts the elite’s preferred multicultural narrative, which places all faiths and cultures on equal footing — except for our despised Western civilization. The truth must therefore be suppressed. But the lies are starting to backfire. Victims can’t be ignored indefinitely, and it’s hard to hide mass-scale public assaults. Since 9/11, Western governments and mainstream media have relentlessly pounded their people with deception and wishful thinking about Islam, jihad, and the Middle East. The lies are now being exposed by the light of day. Will enough people care?
Here is classic example of denial. Mayor Jim Kenny and his astonishing double-speak regarding an admitted Islamist’s attempt to assassinate of Philadelphia police officer :
The president, who often has much to say about white police officers shooting black thugs, was silent regarding the ISIS acolyte and his attempt to kill a patrolman. Does Obama believe such stories get in the way of the law-abiding America-loving refugee image he’d like to perpetuate as he tries to import more Muslims into America? How long will a discerning public put up with such distortions, lies, and cover-ups?
Newly released letters between likely presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and far-left activist Saul Alinsky show the depth of her own radicalism. You can forget the “Hillary is a moderate” meme.
Since her husband’s first term as president in 1993, Hillary Clinton has portrayed herself as a solid moderate within the Democratic Party whose conservative bona fides even include being a “Goldwater Girl” in the 1964 presidential election.
Nothing could be further from reality. Clinton’s life since college has been unremittingly lived in service to extreme-left ideas — ideas she has at different times sought to disavow or disclaim.
Read More At Investor’s Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/092214-718454-clintons-claims-to-be-moderate-look-thin-after-new-letter-released.htm#ixzz3EMRGcz8F
Follow us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook
NASA, which excelled at navigating men through space to the moon and back, is an agency that has lost its way. The manned moon mission ended in 1972 when Apollo 17 returned to Earth. Then the Space Shuttle program was retired in 2011. Our government space project is now almost asleep, its duty having largely diminished into that of a custodian who makes sure U.S. astronauts get a lift from Russian cosmonauts to, and back from, the International Space Station.
This virtual dormancy opens space wide to the private sector, where capitalists and entrepreneurs will do a far better job than government.
If this scare-mongering report is NASA’s future, we should shut it down and give the money back to the taxpayers. It’s better than paying for more loony reports of impending doom.
The U.S., sadly, has become a nation of dependents, and Obamanomics is accelerating the process. With debt at $17 trillion and rising, more than $50 trillion in unfunded liabilities, and fewer workers to pay for it all we will soon be bankrupt.
A nation of welfare dependents who won’t or can’t work or pay taxes cannot prosper. Instead, it becomes stagnant and unproductive. We’re well on our way.
The short video explains the power of voting with your purchases and how choosing American -made produces will stem the tide of outsourcing.
There are three points that I believe will spell failure to an otherwise solid plan to reinvigorate the American economy. First, Americans by and large are terrible voters and make poor choices when given the power to choose. They gave the fox the keys to the hen house twice when it came for electing an executive to the White House! Voting with their purchases is really asking a lot from a populace who decided to throw their country away when they casted their ballots for Obama.
The second point concerns economic laws. Paying more and getting less runs counter to getting the most bang out of your buck. Buying just an extra 5% of American made products doesn’t seem like much, but spreading that increase across the nation will in fact employ the power of economies of scale. Certainly, the sheer force of numbers will drive businesses to supply the demand. Sure, the old law of supply and demand will buoy up the sectors of the economy where people are purchasing more products. Nevertheless, there are fatal systemic problems that the narrator didn’t touch on.
Finally, systemic problems promote a toxic economic environment. Government’s overreaching regulations, onerous taxation, and a host of business disincentives drives jobs, talent, and wealth from our shores. The American people, perhaps unknowingly, voted for this array of wealth-killing initiatives by electing a president who knows nothing about creating wealth, but certainly excels in taking it or destroying it.
I can’t knock the narrator for putting forth an approach that empowers consumers to promote positive economic change. Lord knows our country needs it. However, the very people who need to make these changes are also the ones who voted for America’s demise. We are quickly becoming a nation of takers and looters. Government policy has created the perfect death spiral of disincentives that fuel a perpetuating underclass dependent on an elected entity that eviscerates the economic forces that would have created the jobs, opportunities, and independence for the very people they claim to be helping. Let the truth be know, the politicians really don’t want people to be independent; they just might start thinking on their own and start voting for the other guy who promotes liberty and wealth through free markets, smaller government, and rule of law.
Granted, buying American products will promote job growth, but it’s a pipe dream when we have an electorate that puts a man like Obama in the highest office in the land. Don’t forget to thank the fourth estate, our beloved media, for making the Obamanation a reality.
Lew told CNN\’s \”State of the Union\” show last Sunday \”there is no option preventing us from being in default if we don\’t have the cash to pay our bills.\”
No option? In reality, we have more than enough cash to pay our debts. Revenues flowing into federal coffers exceed our debt payments by nearly 12-to-1.
Sure, if we breached the debt ceiling, we would have to cut federal spending elsewhere and shut down some unnecessary functions of government — a kind of Super Sequester. But our debts would be paid.
Building a Smart Grid to get into a telecom sector already well-served by private companies was a bad idea from the start. But getting government involved in places it doesn’t belong is a hallmark of your administration. As a result, you and your policymakers were happy to fund the Gig to Nowhere.You claimed that the Smart Grid would create jobs for Chattanooga. But in reality, all it did was push America deeper in debt and lure a local government agency into making a terrible financial decision that will weigh on Chattanoogans like a millstone for decades to come.So excuse us, Mr. President, for our lack of enthusiasm for your new jobs program. Here in Chattanooga we’re still reeling from your old one.
Drew Johnson, an editor for the Chattanoogan paper, was subsequently fired for the above article that was entitled “Take Your Jobs Program And Shove It, Mr. President.” This is an obvious display of liberals and spineless management silencing opponents of Barry thus protecting him from fact-based criticism. The presidents supporters can’t function within the realm of ideas and facts; their objective is to simply snuff out contrary opinion.
Theories for the pause include that deep oceans have taken up more heat with the result that the surface is cooler than expected, that industrial pollution in Asia or clouds are blocking the sun, or that greenhouse gases trap less heat than previously believed.The change may be a result of an observed decline in heat-trapping water vapor in the high atmosphere, for unknown reasons. It could be a combination of factors or some as yet unknown natural variations, scientists say.
The swine said:
How did the ice age come to an end? It was global warming, but man’s industrialization was not even a factor. Again, these are the MSNBC and Salon lunatics who want more government, less freedom, and more of your hard-earned money.